FAA Awards $12 Million for 19 Drone Research Projects

The FAA awarded $12 million across 19 UAS research projects covering detect-and-avoid, identity, traffic management, satellite links and long-range operations.

Editorial illustration of multiple drones, radar and a control tower at a UAS test range

The FAA awarded $12 million across 19 drone research and testing projects on October 5, 2026. The portfolio targets practical barriers to routine UAS operations: detecting other aircraft, verifying a drone’s identity and authorization, coordinating drone and conventional air traffic, using satellite communications, and managing long-range or urban missions.

This is research funding, not a blanket operating approval or a promise that every project will become a deployed national system. The awards were made through the FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems Broad Agency Announcement program, which pairs recipients with FAA-designated UAS Test Sites to generate data that can inform future safety standards and integration decisions.

What the FAA funded

The project list spans aircraft, communications, surveillance, identity and traffic-management work. General Atomics and Skydweller received projects involving systems intended to help larger drones avoid other aircraft. Censys Technologies will test satellite communications for long-range operations, while Devorto Corporation’s project concerns long-range cargo-drone service.

Several awards focus on the shared airspace infrastructure needed to scale beyond isolated demonstrations. ANRA Technologies appears four times, covering connections among air taxis, vertiports and flight procedures; a common altitude reference for drones; links between drone traffic systems and conventional airport traffic systems; and AI-assisted drone identification. DroneUp’s project addresses secure verification of drone identity and permission to fly.

SPS Aerial Remote Sensing received three projects involving drone visibility, traffic-management and counter-drone sensors, and sensor-performance measurement. Other recipients include OneRadio for passive-radar testing, Frequentis USA for a technology demonstration, Aerial Vantage for reserved urban airspace management, Lighthouse Avionics for surveillance along long-range routes, ResilienX for mission-resource coordination, and Oklahoma State University for visibility research through Aero Aware.

Why the award matters

The mix of projects shows where the FAA still needs operational evidence. Routine long-range flights depend on more than an aircraft’s endurance. Regulators and operators also need dependable detect-and-avoid performance, communications resilience, consistent altitude data, identity assurance and coordination with other users of the National Airspace System.

The announcement also spreads funding across nine FAA-designated UAS Test Sites, including facilities in Alaska, North Dakota, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma and Indiana. Test-site work can expose technologies to different terrain, traffic, weather and mission profiles before the FAA relies on the results for broader policy or operational decisions.

What the announcement does not establish

  • It does not authorize routine BVLOS operations for the recipients.
  • It does not certify the funded systems or guarantee procurement.
  • It does not divide the $12 million equally among the 19 projects; the FAA announcement does not publish individual award amounts.
  • It does not replace the separate rulemaking and approval processes governing commercial operations.

For operators, the practical takeaway is that the FAA is funding the supporting infrastructure needed for more scalable UAS activity rather than concentrating only on new aircraft. That complements the agency’s broader integration work, including its expanded BEYOND program and ongoing policy development around routine long-range operations.

Readers following that regulatory work can also see our coverage of the legal challenge to the FAA’s drone-delivery environmental review. The research awards and that litigation address different questions, but together they illustrate how technical testing, environmental review and rulemaking must advance in parallel.

Sources

Image disclosure: The featured image is an AI-generated editorial illustration representing UAS research and does not depict a specific FAA-funded test, recipient or aircraft configuration. All About UAVs independently selected the topic and conclusions.


Discover more from All About UAVs

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *